<aside> <img src="/icons/new-alert_gray.svg" alt="/icons/new-alert_gray.svg" width="40px" /> Read This Before Approving Cards

This guide applies to all Maintainers, regardless of seniority, and ensures that Project Malleus can continue to pride itself on a strong peer review process. It should be read alongside the Card Submissions Guidelines document.

</aside>

Revision date: August 29, 2024.

<aside> <img src="/icons/warning_yellow.svg" alt="/icons/warning_yellow.svg" width="40px" /> Please follow these guidelines before approving cards.

</aside>

<aside> <img src="/icons/arrow-northeast_gray.svg" alt="/icons/arrow-northeast_gray.svg" width="40px" />

Tagging Resources

Tags Database

University Tags

Submission Guidelines (Updated)

Recommended Resources

</aside>

General Rules

• Only start approving/rejecting cards when you feel you are comfortable with the standard of cards in the Malleus deck and have thoroughly read the Submission Guidelines
• Try to leave cards submitted by new collaborators to more senior Maintainers such as;
  • @Stapedius
  • @alexlewis
  • @braviboron
• Be aware accepting cards that are of low yield or beyond the scope of the project can dramatically impact the deck’s usefulness to future users
• Try to ask contributors of the deck to set the scope of their cards to the PassMed ‘high yield’ database here
• Avoid

Insert flowchart here

📝 Malleus Card Maintainer Review Flow

🔎 0) Pre-check

• IF you are not comfortable with the topic → Defer (add reviewer-needed, @tag someone on AnkiHub)
• ELSE continue.

🧭 1) Scope

• IF out of scope → Reject (OUT_OF_SCOPE)
• ELSE continue.

🎯 2) Minimum Cue Principle (MIP)

• IF violates MIP and cannot be fixed → Reject (MIP_REJECT)
• IF violates MIP but fixable → Needs Remediation (ask submitter to split/tighten cue)